| October 2009 |
|
POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS' PENSION BOARD REGULAR MEETING Pursuant to authority of Ordinance C-00-34, Article II, this regular meeting of the Police & Firefighters' Pension Board convened at 12:30 P.M., Wednesday, October 14, 2009 in the Pension Board Conference Room, 888 S. Andrews Avenue, Suite 202, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33316.
PRESENT:
ALSO PRESENT: ASSET VALUE as of October 13, 2009: $393,874,881 Chairman Dew called the meeting to order at 12:30 p.m.
Communications to City Commission: MINUTES: Motion made by Mr. Bayne, seconded by Mr. Fortunato, to waive the reading of the minutes for Regular Meeting, September 2, 2009, and approve them as a whole. Mr. Hole noted a typographical error on page 3 that changed the word ‘not’ to ‘no’. With no further discussion, the motion carried unanimously.
BENEFITS REVIEW:
Motion made by Mr. Hole, seconded by Mr. Rudominer, to waive the reading of the benefits and approve them as a whole. In a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously.
BILLS: The following bills were submitted: Motion made by Mr. Rudominer, seconded by Mr. Fortunato, to waive the reading of the bills and approve them as a whole. Mr. Burnam noted the change on the Northern Trust bill in the Board’s favor since converting to a fee-based contract. Mr. Hole also noted that according to his bill, Mr. Stanley stayed within his quoted amount for the project with the State. Mr. Rudominer inquired about the Systematic prorated charges. The balance earned prorated interest based on the day that money was withdrawn. In a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously. INPUT FROM ACTIVE & RETIRED POLICE OFFICERS & FIREFIGHTERS: Mr. Gurdak asked about any news in reference to the COLA clause being reinstated. Chairman Dew reminded Mr. Gurdak that the issue will not be addressed until the negotiations between the City and the unions come to close. Mr. Gurdak also updated the Board on the status of the consulting for FPPTA. FPPTA is working with the Retirees’ Association and hope to begin operations at the end of the year. ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT – Randall Stanley’s Letter: Ms. Wenguer presented with the Board with a letter from Randall Stanley detailing the differences between the audit and actuary report. The Board requested this a few months before. Frank Colleran: Mr. Colleran did not attend the October meeting so the discussion on his formula and will be postponed and added to the agenda until he is present. Investment Seminar: Ms. Wenguer presented the preliminary agenda for the Investment Seminar in December and asked for the Board’s suggestions. Mr. Hole asked why Intech was not on the agenda. The question was deferred until the conference call with Jason Pulos. Mr. Burnam agreed to select a speaker to address a general topic of interest. Notice of Elections: The Administrator reported that the notices of elections were sent out and nominations are due by October 31, 2009 for the seats currently occupied by Mr. Dew and Mr. Bayne. The Board also discussed Mr. Burnam’s seat, which the City must consider for next year.
ACTUARIAL IMPACT STATEMENT, John Dargis, Ft. Lauderdale Employee Relations: Mr. Jack Lokeinsky, FOP President, addressed the Board to express his unwillingness to contribute funds for this study. Mr. Lokeinsky said FOP had spent more than $50,000 during the previous negotiations to conduct studies and seminars with the help of City attorney Robert Klausner and actuary Randall Stanley, in an effort to keep the pension from being closed. Mr. Lokeinsky cited the January 6, 2009 Commission meeting minutes where the City approved an actuarial budget of $159,000 to be paid to Jose Fernandez at Cavanaugh. He asked that a public records request be made if necessary to prove that there are funds from this line item on the City’s budget available to be applied to Stanley Holcombe for the proposed impact study. Motion made by Mr. Naugle, seconded by Mr. Fortunato, to authorize Randall Stanley to address the issues set forth in Mr. Dargis’ letter of October 12, 2009, at the sole cost of the City, in a contract to be arranged between the City and the actuary, provided that a copy of the study will be given to the Board upon its release. In a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously. Not being authorized to agree to the motion, Mr. Dargis said he would report back to the City on the Board’s decision. BNY MELLON CONVERGEX, Presentation: Mr. Carey Pack and Mr. Christian Kraus made an impromptu visit to the Board. Chairman Dew asked them to speak briefly to the Board. They introduced themselves and discussed the service they provide including commission recapture. ASSET CONSULTING GROUP, Jason Pulos (via telephone): Mr. Pulos first reviewed the asset allocation and plans for portfolio transition and rebalancing. He summarized the sources and uses necessary to triple the target weighting in international investing as well as slightly increasing the target for Long/Short Equity. The source of funds and reductions would primarily come from the Large Cap investments and less so from the Small Cap. He gave a detailed description of monthly cash flow needs for the plan and how we can expect to meet that as well as the new targets. He cautioned the Board that the changes will not occur overnight. In a discussion on GTS, Mr. Pulos felt that the upcoming transition that involves moving 12 or 13 percent of the assets could benefit from a transition manager like GTS. He discussed the differences between GTS and a broker like BNY Convergex. A broker presents multiple bids from a single source that estimates the commission costs in transitioning. Mr. Pulos admitted that he spent some time understanding GTS’ operations. Their service is completely different in that they oversee the transition but they are not the executing broker. Therefore, they solicit bids from multiple brokers and select the one who could provide the best execution at the most reasonable commission. Mr. Pulos concluded that he would feel comfortable if the Board decided to employ the services of GTS. Motion made by Mr. Rudominer, seconded by Mr. Burnam, to accept the rebalancing as presented in the modified proposal by Mr. Pulos. In a voice vote, the motion carried unanimously. Motion made by Mr. Fortunato, seconded by Mr. Rudominer, to initiate a one-year contract with GTS as transition manager, provided the contract is approved by Mr. Cypen. In a voice vote, the motion carried with Mr. Burnam dissenting. Mr. Burnam felt that the Board should use GTS on a per case basis. Mr. Hole asked about InTech’s absence from the agenda for the Investment Seminar. Mr. Pulos said they would be present but that there was not a specific topic they had to address. The Board agreed to discuss TIPS in November. ADMINISTRATOR REVIEW: The Board received a packet related to the Administrator’s review. That packet included the job description, current contract, goals and objectives for the year, and a salary survey. Mr. Hole expressed concern for the weight given to the salary survey that was put together by an Administrator from another plan. He thought that the plans listed were mostly “heavy hitters”, allowing the average Administrator salary to be higher than what he believed it actually is. Chairman Dew reported Ms. Wenguer’s score of 60%, which puts her performance at above average. The Board asked that the salary survey be redone with notes whether the Administrators identified are 3rd party administrators or any other special detail that would be significant. Mr. Bayne also requested a Total Compensation Package for all Administrators listed. Due to the absence of the Mr. Dew at the November meeting, this item will be discussed again in December. OLD BUSINESS – Retirement Seminar: Ms. Maldonado confirmed that all was on track for the seminar on October 29 & 30. The citywide emails had been sent and RSVP’s from active members were coming in.
Pension Verification Letters: Ms. Wenguer discussed the 3 letters that were still outstanding.
NEW BUSINESS – Public Records Policy: Mr. Hole provided a copy for the Board to view and asked that this be implemented as a policy. Mr. Cypen advised that the policy must be adopted and noted if the Board intends to charge a service cost for a job that takes more than a reasonable amount of time to complete, which is usually 15 minutes. He also emphasized that we are not obligated to copy documents for which the Plan is not a custodian of (i.e. City ordinance changes.) Credit Cards: The Administrator clarified that the cards will not be used until a policy for their use is created. Our current travel policy will remain but does not currently discuss the use of Board credit cards. After determining that the use of the credit cards will not be mandated, Mr. Naugle and Mr. Hole expressed that they were not interested in using one. Securities Litigation Interviews: The Board asked that Mr. Hole and Ms. Wenguer schedule the top 3 for interviews for up to 10 minutes in December. SPD: The Administrator confirmed receipt of the copies and that they will be distributed. She noted that she did not count retirees among the recipients of the SPD but it is also available online. Age Discrimination (Lerman Case): Mr. Hole and Mr. Cypen confirmed that the denial of the DROP case was upheld. Quarterly Newsletter/Magazine: Mr. Nesbitt reported Dave Williams, a Plan Administrator in the Hollywood area, is willing to offer his services to put together a newsletter for the Board. The Board agreed to inquire about the fee and possibly pursue this avenue in the near future. Quarterly Budget Discussion: Ms. Wenguer pointed out that the actuarial budget was overextended as was expected. Most other items seemed to be right on target at 75% expenditures with only the Miscellaneous Operating Expenses over 100%. Out-of-State Disability: The Board confirmed that, in reference to an upcoming disability for a person who does not live in Florida, they will not cover travel or lodging expenses. Also if a doctor performing an IME charges a fee to have a person or advocate attend the appointment, that fee will also not be covered by the Board. Michael Kinneer’s Conference Attendance: Mr. Hole asked the Board to consider sending the Finance Officer to FPPTA or other such conferences that would expose Mr. Kinneer to investing for a public pension fund. As he sits also on the GERS Board, the expense to send Mr. Kinneer would be split between the two boards. The Board agreed to only be concerned about sending him to FPPTA and Division of Retirement conferences, with all costs being divided with GERS.
Commission Bullet Points: The following bullets were approved to share with the Commission: Motion made by Mr. Burnam, seconded by Mr. Fortunato, to adjourn the meeting at 3:10 P.M. With no further business brought before the Board, the motion carried unanimously.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||